From canon to algorithm: The dynamics of Indonesian literature as world literature in the digital platform era
Downloads
The rapid development of digital platforms has significantly transformed the production, circulation, and consumption of literary works, creating new possibilities for the position of Indonesian literature within world literature. Traditionally, the inclusion of literary works in global literary circulation has largely depended on translation, literary institutions, publishers, critics, and international cultural networks. However, the emergence of digital platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Wattpad, and YouTube has introduced new mechanisms through which literary visibility and legitimacy are produced. This article examines how digital platforms reshape the dynamics of Indonesian literature as world literature by shifting literary circulation from institution-centered mechanisms toward platform-driven and algorithmically mediated systems. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the study integrates David Damrosch’s concept of world literature with José van Dijck’s theory of platform society and Henry Jenkins’ notion of participatory culture. The findings indicate that digital platforms expand opportunities for literary mobility beyond national and linguistic boundaries while simultaneously transforming the processes through which literary value and visibility are established. Readers increasingly function not only as consumers but also as curators, promoters, interpreters, and distributors of literary content. Consequently, Indonesian literature’s participation in world literature is no longer determined solely by translation and institutional recognition but also by the interactions among users, communities, platforms, and algorithms. This transformation introduces new forms of literary mobility and offers fresh perspectives for comparative literary studies in the digital era.
Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. Emerald Publishing.
Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341456
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.
Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Casanova, P. (2004). The world republic of letters. Harvard University Press.
Damrosch, D. (2003). What is world literature? Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827450
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.
Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2012). What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 3–11). University of Minnesota Press.
Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix nations: The geography of digital distribution. New York University Press.
Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.
Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for literary history. Verso.
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture: For the web and beyond (4th ed.). O’Reilly Media.
Sapiro, G. (2016). How do literary works cross borders (or not)? A sociological approach to world literature. Journal of World Literature, 1(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00101009
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 203–218.
UNESCO. (2022). Re|Shaping policies for creativity: Addressing culture as a global public good. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Culture and digital technologies: Towards a digital transformation of the cultural and creative sectors. UNESCO.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Venuti, L. (2012). The translation studies reader (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2026 Heru Marwata

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

