Poetry as literature and performance: Toward a negotiation model of verbal and performative aesthetics
Downloads
This article examines the relationship between poetry as a verbal structure and poetry as a performative event by positioning verbal aesthetics and performative aesthetics as two modes that dynamically negotiate with one another. The study addresses the tendency to view poetry reading as merely transferring a text from the page to the stage, although poetic actualization involves voice, body, space, temporality, and the conditions of performance. The study employs an interpretive qualitative approach with comparative textual-performative analysis of two Indonesian poems, namely “Gerilya” by W. S. Rendra and “Ke Pelabuhan” by Toeti Heraty, together with audiovisual documentation of their performances. The analysis proceeds in three stages: identifying verbal-aesthetic structures, examining performative elements, and comparing the two to identify forms of meaning negotiation. The findings show that repetition, imagery, rhythm, and syntactic structure in the texts provide performative potential that is actualized through vocal quality, tempo, pauses, gesture, bodily presence, and spatial configuration. Across the two cases, reinforcement and shifts receive the strongest empirical support, whereas expansion is primarily evident in the addition of spatial-temporal dimensions of experience. On this basis, the article proposes a Negotiation Model of Verbal and Performative Aesthetics, which views poetic meaning as the outcome of dynamic interaction between verbal structure and performative actualization. The model complements intermediality by focusing specifically on the mechanisms of meaning-making when poetry operates across media
Auslander, P. (2008). Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ayala Gallardo, F. J. (2024). Poetry in action: Intermediality and performance in La Palabra Itinerante. Tropelías: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, 41, 15–34.
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2024418978
Bäckström, P., Führer, H., & Schirrmacher, B. (2022). The intermediality of performance. In J. Bruhn & B. Schirrmacher (Eds.), Intermedial studies: An introduction to meaning across media (pp. 198–224). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003174288-12
Clavel-Vázquez, A. (2025). Embodied voices, disembodied pages, and the second-personal turn in aesthetics: Comments on Karen Simecek’s Philosophy of lyric voice: The cognitive value of page and performance poetry. Philosophia, 53, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-025-00839-4
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Culler, J. (2015). Theory of the lyric. Harvard University Press.
Eagleton, T. (2007). How to read a poem. Blackwell Publishing.
Elleström, L. (Ed.). (2010). Media borders, multimodality and intermediality. Palgrave Macmillan.
Finnegan, R. (2025). Oral poetry. Open Book Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0428
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics (S. I. Jain, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 2004)
Heraty, T. (1995). Ke pelabuhan. In Nostalgi = transendensi. Grasindo.
Howarth, P. (2023). Performed poetry and all-round experience. English: Journal of the English Association, 72(278), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efad022
Hutcheon, L., & O’Flynn, S. (2013). A theory of adaptation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Language in literature (K. Pomorska & S. Rudy, Eds.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Matter, M., Wehmeier, H., & Wolff, C. C. (Eds.). (2024). Audioliterary poetry between performance and mediatization/Audioliterale Lyrik zwischen Performance und Mediatisierung. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111561356
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen.
Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: The politics of performance. Routledge.
Rajewsky, I. O. (2005). Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités, 6, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005505ar
Rendra, W. S. (1955). Gerilya. Siasat, 9(42).
Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies: An introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Simecek, K. (2023). Philosophy of lyric voice: The cognitive value of page and performance poetry. Bloomsbury Academic.
Simecek, K. (2024). Bridging the gap between page and performance poetry. In R. Bradford, M. Gonzalez, & K. De Ornellas (Eds.), A companion to literary evaluation (pp. 212–225). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409908.ch14
Svensson, J. (2024). Voicing the text, texting the voice: Transmediation in a poetry reading by Louise Glück. Semiotika, 19, 8–32. https://doi.org/10.15388/Semiotika.2024.1
Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: Performing cultural memory in the Americas. Duke University Press.
Zumthor, P. (1990). Oral poetry: An introduction (K. Murphy-Judy, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1983).
Copyright (c) 2026 Musthofa Kamal, Wahyudi Teguh Tri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

